BBW Business Services - Finance And Accounting Outsourcing Services

Get finance and accounting outsourcing services, financial services outsourcing, financial outsourcing services.

BBW Business Services offer Bookkeeping Services

Bookkeeping Outsourcing Services, Bookkeeping Outsource,Outsource Bookkeeping Services,Outsourced Bookkeeping Services

BBW Business Services - Payroll Outsourcing Services

Payroll Outsourcing Services, Outsourcing Payroll Services Brisbane, Outsourcing Payroll Services Australia, Outsourcing Payroll Services

Self Managed Superannuation fund

BBW Business Services offer, Self Managed Superannuation fund, Self managed super funds Australia, Superannuation in Australia

Outsourcing Accounts Payable Services

Go for services Outsourcing Accounts Payable, Outsourcing accounts payable services, Outsource accounts payable india Accounts payable outsource provider, Outsource accounts payable, Outsource Accounts Payable India, Outsourcing Accounts Payable Companies

Saturday 29 November 2014

Australian SMEs Targeted By Employees In Cyber Attacks

Australian small businesses are "under attack" from cyber criminals, as increasing numbers of small businesses are having data stolen from both external threats and disgruntled employees, a new survey has revealed. The survey released this week by security company McAfee found 45% of surveyed SMBs had been the target of an electronic attack in the past year – but that 46% had suffered a data or security breach as the result of disgruntled former or current employees. 

Of those businesses, 24% had experienced this kind of attack three or more times. 

Such findings are not uncommon. Several similar surveys from security firms have revealed SMEs are increasingly coming under attack, with cybercriminals opting to infiltrate smaller firms, which have less reliable security systems. 

David Markus, SmartCompany tech blogger and Combo managing director, says SMBs are underinvesting in their IT systems, on the basis that "they get away with it most of the time". 

"This used to be okay, but today we're living in the information age and every business has become dependent on their IT systems." 

"There's now a significant motivation for people to hack whatever they can get into, it's only a matter of time before everyone is attacked. It's a numerical fact." 

McAfee Asia-Pacific SMB manager Robbie Upcroft told SmartCompany the statistics from the survey of 200 Australian businesses reflect a growing trend among SMBs. 

"The sensational headline is SMBs are under attack, but this isn't too far from the truth. If you think about the way cyber criminals are operating, they're going to go where they can make an easy buck. 

"Many SMBs don't know or appreciate that the threat is real and that it could happen to them and, worryingly, many don't have policies or procedure in place to combat this growing threat," he says. 

Upcroft says SMBs are an easy target for cyber criminals. 

"If you're a cyber criminal you can go after consumers with little data, you can go after the big corporations which you know will have protective measures in places, or you can target SMBs which have emerged as a lucrative area for the cyber criminals. 

"They're seen as potentially an easier target because of their lack of security, but they're a goldmine because every SMB has information which is important and valuable to someone else." 

"For example, a small publishing company would have all the personal credit card data of customers," he says. 

The high numbers of employees past and present stealing from their employer is a problem generally unique to SMBs. 

"We haven't seen it as strongly in the larger organisations because they often have a greater handle on who has access to the data and where it's flowing," Upcroft says. 

"For example, in many smaller businesses employees have the ability to dial in from home, but sometimes they don't think about what happens when a person is fired and they don't have procedures in place to have the remote access is switched off, so the former employee still has access to all the company information," he says. 

Markus says businesses need to think about the measures they can afford. 

"These include things like external spam filters, not running webservers in house and putting basic firewalls in place and anti-virus software." 

"For many businesses, if their data is gone, the cost would be their business." 

The survey also found two thirds of respondents had experienced an electronic attack in the form of a virus, worm or Trojan in the last 12 months. Almost one in three had also been subject to Ransomware (an external threat where a cybercriminal blocks access to a business's valuable data and charges it a fee to access the information). 

Of the 30% of those surveyed coming into contact with Ransomware, 36.1% had paid money to the criminals to retrieve the data. 

More than 58% of the respondents were not even aware Ransomware was a threat. 

On top of the digital threats, many businesses have also lost data via the theft of a laptop, notebook, desktop PC or USB. Of those surveyed 47% of SMBs had had a laptop or PC stolen and 58% had a company USB or portable hard drive stolen. 

Upcroft says SMBs need to invest in technology to avoid having "gaps in your armour". 

"You don't have to spend much, but all small businesses need to think about ways they can protect their information." 

Upcroft says computers and USBs should all be password protected and within organisation people should only have access to information vital to their jobs. He says cyber attacks are going to continue to increase at a "fairly steep rate". 

"The sheer volume of data SMBs have online, the bring-your-own-device phenomenon and the amount of information they're keeping in the cloud, makes it so attractive for the attacker to go after that market," he says. 

Not only can cyber attacks result in a loss of data, they can also be costly. In 2009, an entrepreneur was hit with $120,000 phone bill after hackers made 11,000 international calls from his internet-connected phone system. 

This news story is reprinted from www.smartcompany.com.au 

Read more details on Self Managed Superannuation fund

Thursday 27 November 2014

Wealthy Tax Evaders On Australian Taxation Office Hit-List

RICH Australians owing hundreds of millions of dollars in unpaid taxes are about to be tapped for the cash they have hidden in tax havens around the world.

The Australian Taxation Office says the net is closing in on the wealthy tax evaders who are about to be given a “last chance opportunity” to declare the assets they have squirreled away overseas.

Commissioner of Taxation Chris Jordan today announced an amnesty for all Australians who have failed to declare foreign income, ahead of a global crackdown that will expose funds held in havens such as Swiss bank accounts.

Under the voluntary disclosure offer called “Project DOT IT”, taxpayers with offshore assets will have until December this year to come clean.

Mr Jordan told the Tax Institute people disclosing their offshore assets would be assessed for the last four years only and be liable for a maximum shortfall penalty of ten per cent of their debt instead of 90 per cent.

Those coming forward also will escape investigation by the ATO and criminal prosecution.

“Now is the time for individuals with offshore income to get their affairs in order and avoid steep penalties and the risk of criminal prosecution for tax avoidance,” Mr Jordan said.

“As governments around the world step up their data sharing and harness powerful technology to find tax cheats, the concept of the tax haven is dying.

“It is just a matter of time before you will be caught.

“If you have got international tax liabilities act now and come forward and we will bring you back into the system with a heavily reduced penalty.

“If you do not declare your interests you will be caught and penalised.”

Tax office deputy commissioner Michael Cranston said the amnesty was not just for high income earners _ it would be open to any Australian who had not declared foreign income or capital gains or who had over-claimed deductions.

In recent years, information sharing between countries has increased greatly with banking data exchanged automatically and the G20 promoting global tax transparency.

Australia currently has exchange agreements with about 40 countries but that will swell to 100 in the next few years.

Mr Jordan said: “These actions plus enhanced information exchange mechanisms and other intelligence means we will find hidden income.

“There is also the future benefits we will achieve by bringing these assets and income back into the Australian tax system.” Through international co-operation the ATO claims to have made “significant progress” in collecting offshore tax revenue.

Even countries previously thought of as tax havens, such as Switzerland and the Cayman Islands, are increasing transparency.

The Swiss are co-operating more closely with Australia and a formal agreement to share information is expected as early as next year.

During the last amnesty in 2010 the ATO received 8000 voluntary disclosures netting $200 million in extra tax and a further $74 million through future returns.

Tax chiefs expect the latest amnesty could bring in $500 million.

This news story is reprinted from www.dailytelegraph.com.au

Read more details on financial outsourcing services

Wednesday 26 November 2014

Australian Tax Office Slashes


Australian Tax Office Slashes 4700 Staff, Brings In $250,000-A-Year Spin Doctor

The Australian Tax Office is hiring a $250,000-a-year media wrangler to sell the idea revenue collection will not fall but its own figures show each of the 4700 staff walking out the door collect an average of $23 million in taxes. 

Tax Commissioner Chris Jordan's newest senior executive will respond to "high profile, high risk" media enquiries and craft the single most important message the organisation needs to send to the public: that cutbacks to staff numbers will not have any "material impact" on revenue collection. 

The ATO's assistant commissioner of public affairs will help Commissioner Jordan brief Assistant Treasurer Mathias Cormann on tax collection which needs to be maintained even though 3000 staff left by October and another 1700 were scheduled to go. 

An ATO spokeswoman said it was an existing position currently occupied under acting arrangements due to a permanent transfer out of the role.

Selling the idea tax revenue will not be hurt as staff numbers are slashed could be a hire wire act. ATO figures used in a report tabled in the House of Representatives on Monday show each Tax Office employee represents $23.58 million of tax collected - many millions of dollars more than agents in three comparable first-world nations. 

ATO employees collect on average $10 million more revenue than counterparts in the United Kingdom ($14.7 million), New Zealand ($14 million) and Ireland ($13 million).

Australia's "gross revenue collected per staff member" figure was also almost on par with Norway ($25.9 million) and Denmark ($25.2 million).

The original source of the comparison table is the OECD's Forum on Tax Administration. 

The ATO provided the figures to the committee to show how Australia's cost of tax collection had improved in recent years.

But top Tax Office bureaucrats do not want the figures used to argue revenue collection will drop when staff numbers are slashed.

The report by parliament's standing committee on tax and revenue quoted the ATO's second commissioner Neil Olesen who was confident tax collection - so vital when the Abbott government was trying to find savings everywhere - would not be hurt.

Mr Olesen said it was a "simplistic view that you just divide the revenue base by the number of officers in the organisation and that equates to revenue per head of the person working in the organisation".

"That is just not how it works," he said. 

"The variety of functions that people do, the variety of risks they might address, the kind of work they do varies enormously.

"You certainly cannot apply a simplistic average to every person and say that for everyone who works in the organisation they bring in this amount of money."

The latest available figures which could be compared showed that in 2011 Australia collected $361.3 billion with 18,196 full time equivalent staff.

Staff numbers and revenue collection have increased since then.

The number of ATO staff was now about 20,000 and collected $419 billion in gross tax last financial year.

This news story is reprinted from www.smh.com.au

Read more details on Outsourced Practice Management Services

Monday 24 November 2014

ATO Letting Big Multinationals Get Away With It

Martin Lock was formerly the top withholding-tax specialist at the Tax Office, a role that encompassed oversight of profit shifting by multinationals.

He is one of many former officers who have voiced their concerns to Fairfax Media about the challenge of arresting the slide in tax receipts from multinational companies operating in Australia.

Like many of his colleagues, Lock took a voluntary redundancy in June this year. During the past three years, the number of those at the Australian Taxation Office supervising international activities has been gutted, with staffing levels about a quarter of what they were. That at a time when the scourge of tax avoidance, particularly by United States tech giants, has been more pronounced than ever.

Ongoing tax secrecy laws prevent former tax officers commenting on specific company tax affairs. All of Lock's observations are based on information in the public domain.

He pulls no punches describing the profound problems of large-scale tax avoidance, describing the Australian Tax Office as politicised under the spell of Treasury and unaccountable to the public.

Its top bureaucrats are reluctant, he says, to prosecute large companies and the Big Four global tax advisory firms, PricewaterhouseCoopers, KPMG, Deloitte and Ernst & Young – as evidenced by PwC's role in the recent LuxLeaks scandal – are intimately involved in facilitating tax avoidance.

What emerges is a picture of an agency that has become compromised by powerful vested interests, although it continues to pursue small taxpayers with vigour.

Profit shifting has become a monumental problem, not just for Australia but for all developed countries with relatively high corporate tax rates. Despite this, the Australian Tax Office, though required by legislation to act independently, is yet to report the scale of the problem to parliament through the Commissioner's annual reports, says Lock.

Instead, it has been politicised, he says, and is acting as an agent of Treasury while the parliament and the public are kept in the dark.

"Innumerable references, both in its annual reports and on its website to 'working with Treasury', and ... parroting Treasurer Joe Hockey's words, belie an unapologetically politicised ATO," Lock says.

"Responding to the recent Luxembourg revelations concerning corporate tax avoidance and PwC's complicity in it, [the ATO] uses the politically charged and hackneyed terms 'aggressive tax planning' and 'unfair tax competition' as if they had any meaning or consequence under Australia's tax laws."

Under the law, they don't.

Moreover, aggressiveness and unfairness in tax avoidance are not yardsticks of tax liability; what is relevant is whether the ATO can prove that a multinational's tax schemes do not carry the tax consequences the multinational claims.

"And that's the nub of the problem, a problem the ATO speaks little about, in particular to parliament to whom it is ultimately answerable."

To achieve "tax effective outcomes" and remain "tax competitive", multinationals usually engage the services of the global tax advisory firms KPMG, PwC, Deloitte and Ernst & Young, to tailor "tax planning solutions" (concoct tax avoidance schemes, that is).

"Almost effortlessly, a new subsidiary, partnership or trust can be established in any favourable tax jurisdiction, including in a tax-treaty country ('treaty shopping')," says the man whose role encompassed the purview of tax treaties and base-profit erosion.

With little more than book entries, the multinational can then convert billions in equity into billions in "loans" from a related-party, or sell its intellectual property to the related party and license it back, dramatically altering the multinational group's prospective tax bill.

This news story is reprinted fromwww.smh.com.au

Read more details on Taxation Accountants.